> perror(3) is being used instead of err(3) in a few places; is > that on purpose? If it's an oversight, I also noticed the same > in patch(1).
I am using perror in older programs.
> perror(3) is being used instead of err(3) in a few places; is > that on purpose? If it's an oversight, I also noticed the same > in patch(1).
I am using perror in older programs.