On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 12:08:42PM +0200, Tobias Stöckmann wrote: > > On October 6, 2015 at 11:40 AM Stefan Sperling <s...@stsp.name> wrote: > > What do you think about a similar treatment for locale/rune.c? > > I think you refer to _Read_RuneMagi function, > which lacks the same input validation. > > Before supplying a patch for that one, I wanted to get some feedback > for catopen/catgets. If my approach would be wrong or not efficient > or violating style guide, it would just double the work to maintain > multiple patches.
Now that this is committed, do you intend to audit the runes code as well? :-)
