Ted Unangst wrote: > Michael McConville wrote: > > It's probably best to say that UVM_MAPFLAG() returns a uvm_flag_t. It's > > almost exclusively used for uvm_map()'s flag arg, which has that type. > > Of course, it's an arithmetic macro, so it doesn't actually have a > > return type. > > I would argue we should delete some of these bullshit types instead.
Fine by me. No strong opinion, though - I'm very new to this code.
