On 05 Dec 2015 11:25, Tobias Stoeckmann wrote:
> Fortunately I've discovered an issue with this code before it got into
> the tree: xdm(1) fails because it does not call setusershell() before
> getusershell(). This is actually no bug in xdm, because the manual page
> of getusershell(3) states:

this was fixed in the latest version i posted which also included testcases
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to