On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 10:47:09AM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > On 22/01/16(Fri) 08:42, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > > As there isn't any consensus for one of the other solutions, I am going to > > commit the patch that fixes this inside vio(4). > > I think that you should commit the diff that does it unconditionally. > > If people are concerned about the supplementary cycles/packets I'm sure > they can find some other micro optimisations to compensate this check. >
+1
