On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 04:27:06PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote: > There seems to be a "be" missing in install(1). > > The whole phrase seems odd to a non-native speaker like me: > those options "should not be relied upon" because they are not portable, > not "for portability". (But I might easily be wrong.) > > Jan >
fixed, thanks. jmc > > > --- install.1.orig Mon Feb 1 13:57:31 2016 > +++ install.1 Mon Feb 1 13:58:00 2016 > @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ The > .Fl p , > and > .Fl S > -flags are non-standard and should not relied upon for portability. > +flags are non-standard and should not be relied upon for portability. > .Pp > Temporary files may be left in the target directory if > .Nm >
