On 2016/02/08 13:53, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> If you own a skylake based onboard NIC, please give this diff a try.

The most important bit, especially at this point in the release cycle,
is whether it makes any changes that cause problems with other chips.
I don't have time to look closely now but the question is "does
the diff change anything for existing chips, or does it *only* change
things for new chips"?

> Index: dev/pci/pcidevs
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /data/mirror/openbsd/cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/pcidevs,v
> retrieving revision 1.1786
> diff -u -p -r1.1786 pcidevs
> --- dev/pci/pcidevs   30 Jan 2016 01:02:04 -0000      1.1786
> +++ dev/pci/pcidevs   4 Feb 2016 16:04:31 -0000
> @@ -3353,6 +3353,10 @@ product INTEL I218_LM_2                0x15a0  I218-LM
>  product INTEL I218_V_2               0x15a1  I218-V
>  product INTEL I218_LM_3              0x15a2  I218-LM
>  product INTEL I218_V_3               0x15a3  I218-V
> +product INTEL I219_LM                0x156F  I219_LM
> +product INTEL I219_V         0x1570  I219_V
> +product INTEL I219_LM2               0x15B7  I219_LM2
> +product INTEL I219_V2                0x15B8  I219_V2
>  product INTEL X557_AT2               0x15ad  X557-AT2
>  product INTEL CORE5G_H_PCIE_X16      0x1601  Core 5G PCIE
>  product INTEL CORE5G_M_GT1_1 0x1602  HD Graphics

Please maintain numerical order of pid (0x156f/0x1570 are out of place),
and like the other entries use lowercase for pid and s/_/-/ in the text
version of the device name on the right-hand column.

(When committing the pcidevs parts, pcidevs itself needs to be done
first, then "make" to update the generated files before committing
those, so the generated files show the correct RCS ID in comments).

Reply via email to