Michal Mazurek wrote:
> This was ok tb@ but never commited.
> 
> Remove uneeded includes, and sort those that can be sorted (some can't):

Committed (mostly). Thanks!

I left stdlib.h and unistd.h because I think that C99 requires that
those be included when using libc, although failing to do so is
non-fatal. You'll see warnings for this if you use a newer compiler and
build with -Wall.

> Index: df.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/df/df.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.54
> diff -u -p -r1.54 df.c
> --- df.c      9 Oct 2015 01:37:06 -0000       1.54
> +++ df.c      1 Feb 2016 09:43:38 -0000
> @@ -41,7 +41,6 @@
>  #include <err.h>
>  #include <errno.h>
>  #include <fcntl.h>
> -#include <math.h>
>  #include <stdio.h>
>  #include <stdlib.h>
>  #include <string.h>
> Index: ext2fs_df.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/df/ext2fs_df.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.14
> diff -u -p -r1.14 ext2fs_df.c
> --- ext2fs_df.c       27 Nov 2015 13:49:41 -0000      1.14
> +++ ext2fs_df.c       1 Feb 2016 09:43:38 -0000
> @@ -42,11 +42,8 @@
>  #include <sys/mount.h>
>  #include <ufs/ext2fs/ext2fs.h>
>  #include <ufs/ext2fs/ext2fs_dinode.h>
> -#include <unistd.h>
> -#include <stdlib.h>
> +
>  #include <string.h>
> -#include <fcntl.h>
> -#include <fstab.h>
>  
>  int          e2fs_df(int, char *, struct statfs *);
>  
> Index: ffs_df.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/df/ffs_df.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.17
> diff -u -p -r1.17 ffs_df.c
> --- ffs_df.c  27 Nov 2015 13:49:41 -0000      1.17
> +++ ffs_df.c  1 Feb 2016 09:43:38 -0000
> @@ -36,13 +36,10 @@
>  
>  #include <sys/types.h>
>  #include <sys/mount.h>
> -#include <ufs/ufs/dinode.h>
>  #include <ufs/ffs/fs.h>
> +#include <ufs/ufs/dinode.h>
>  
> -#include <unistd.h>
> -#include <stdlib.h>
>  #include <string.h>
> -#include <fcntl.h>
>  
>  int          ffs_df(int, char *, struct statfs *);
> 
> -- 
> Michal Mazurek
> 

Reply via email to