Vadim Zhukov <persg...@gmail.com> writes: > 2016-03-06 1:23 GMT+03:00 Christian Weisgerber <na...@mips.inka.de>: >> > It looks like decided to use TM_ZONE as a wrapper for tm.tm_zone, >> > until the tm_zone is gone. So, until the later happens (I found >> > no usage of tm_zone in base, BTW), we should at least use TM_ZONE >> > consistently. Okay for the patch? >> >> ok naddy@ >> >> Note that tm_gmtoff is wrapped the same way by TM_GMTOFF, and there >> is a similar inconsistent use of tm_gmtoff in wcsftime.c > > You're absolutely right. Here is an updated patch. > > Since %z relies on tm_gmtoff, all we can do is to expand %z to empty > string, as specified in strftime(3). > > Okay for this version?
yup -- jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
