On 09:42:32, 9.03.16, Michal Mazurek wrote:
> On 22:47:08, 8.03.16, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 08/03/16(Tue) 10:01, Michal Mazurek wrote:
> > > p_cpu exists, but p_usrpri isn't based on it.
> >
> > Michal I lost track of all your comment fixes. One of the accepted
> > rules when we read code is that comments are always lying. So I doubt
> > anyone will object fixing them.
> >
> > Could you send a single diff with all your non-committed fixes?
Sorry, I forgot one:
Index: sys/sys/sysctl.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/sys/sysctl.h,v
retrieving revision 1.158
diff -u -p -r1.158 sysctl.h
--- sys/sys/sysctl.h 29 Feb 2016 19:44:07 -0000 1.158
+++ sys/sys/sysctl.h 9 Mar 2016 15:41:04 -0000
@@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ struct kinfo_proc {
int8_t p_stat; /* CHAR: S* process status (from LWP).
*/
u_int8_t p_priority; /* U_CHAR: Process priority. */
- u_int8_t p_usrpri; /* U_CHAR: User-priority based on p_cpu
and ps_nice. */
+ u_int8_t p_usrpri; /* U_CHAR: User-priority based on
p_estcpu and ps_nice. */
u_int8_t p_nice; /* U_CHAR: Process "nice" value. */
u_int16_t p_xstat; /* U_SHORT: Exit status for wait; also
stop signal. */
--
Michal Mazurek
