On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 05:18:52PM -0800, Michael McConville wrote: > This is specified only irregularly, and people who don't know what a > void return type means are beyond help anyway. > > This also adds a sentence specifying that X509_free(3) is NULL-safe, now > that we've removed all NULL-checks for it. I should sweep through and > add the sentence the rest of the NULL-safe LibreSSL *_free() functions > soon. > > ok?
I would keep the one about rewind, maybe make it even stronger. Using rewind is icky. It deliberately hides an error message.
