So I'd say remove it until we decide on an alternative :)
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2016/03/14 10:20, Michael McConville wrote:
>> Craig Skinner wrote:
>> > Hi Hans,
>> >
>> > On 2016-03-14 Mon 11:49 AM |, hans wrote:
>> > > On Mar 13 18:56:00, [email protected] wrote:
>> > > > hans wrote:
>> > > > > The link to "the place to search for blacklists" is dead.
>> > > >
>> > > > Might be better to replace it than to remove it.
>> > >
>> > > Sure. Any suggestions?
>> > >
>> >
>> > Some DNSRBLs are available as files or rsync feeds.
>> >
>> > It takes a bit of digging about, so start with effective ones:
>> >
>> > http://www.intra2net.com/en/support/antispam/
>> > http://www.spamcannibal.org/dnsbl_compare.shtml
>> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_DNS_blacklists
>> > http://multirbl.valli.org/list/
>> >
>> > Offenders can be checked in all at once on:
>> > http://multirbl.valli.org/dnsbl-lookup/
>>
>> I think Spamhaus is the canonical one these days.
>>
>
> There aren't many who provide their whole dataset to anyone other
> than paying customers - e.g. Spamhaus' rsync feeds are for
> organisations with >5000 users and cost US$1700+/year.
>
