>> If you're on OpenBSD, you started with "apropos -s3 sqlite3", were >> shocked that there's nothing there, then moved on to Google with a >> wounding confusion in your heart. > > Indeed. I see this didn't get much traction, but it sounds good to me. We are > shipping sqlite as a system interface. We should provide documentation for at > least the programmatic aspects of it. (The full extent of SQL language > documentation may be beyond the scope of base, but C APIs are not.)
Ted, Yes, the sqlite folks haven't said anything since an initial few exchanges on their list. Not sure what else I can do there, but I've been using the sqlite(3) manpages and now can no longer imagine not having them. Just drop a note if you'd like features or something similar---the only thing I can think of is a check to verify that the markup is sane. (I think there's one or two places where some <dt>s are unmatched?) Best, Kristaps
