On 2016/05/06 16:44, Jyri Hovila [Turvamies.fi] wrote:
> 
> > Anyways, it would be really nice if we can get the issues resolved
> > before end of June, because 6.0 should have this.  It is a valuable
> > security improvement.
> 
> Amen to that!
> 
> -j.

Feel free to investigate the ports I mentioned then. Diffs to
ports@ please - you can test that they work using tedu's diff
that will avoid filling in pw_passwd in the struct, it's usually
just a case of s/(getpwuid|getpwnam)/\1_shadow/.

Reply via email to