On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 06:48:38PM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote: > > > On 06.05.2016, at 18:36, Theo de Raadt <dera...@cvs.openbsd.org> wrote: > > > >> If OpenBSD's behavior of asprintf is non-standard and everyone else is > >> doing it differently, we would probably have to apply the patch. But this > >> would also affect many other places in the tree were we rely on our > >> asprintf semantics. > > > > Actually, we have fixed all usage cases in our tree to be portable. > > > > I have wondered in the past whether we should set the pointer to (void > > *)-1 instead of NULL, because this NULL return is a trap. > > > > > I think enforcing it this way would make much sense. > > I'm a candidate for such traps as I only develop C code on/for OpenBSD. > > OK, this makes Hiltjo's diff a valid addition.
yes agreed, please commit it. ok jung@ > Reyk >
