On Tue, 10 May 2016 22:34:54 +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote: > I reread the REG_STARTEND section again and it turns out I > misinterpreted it's intention and I thought the current behaviour > was wrong/incomplete. So the change was intentional, but for the > wrong reasons. > > I changed the diff to allow regexec to combine REG_NOTBOL and > REG_STARTEND. This way the current syntax stays intact and we can > use the extra flag to do lookbacks to verify that the last > character was a word character or not, without risking going into > unallocated memory. > > Does this look better to you?
That looks much better to me. - todd
