Mark, What does it mean if SEL0002 at acpi0 not configured does not show up when you boot? I haven't tried it yet, but I don't expect that it will print out this message.
Thanks, Chase On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Mark Kettenis <[email protected]> wrote: >> Authentication-Results: xs4all.nl; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; >> dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com; dmarc=pass header.from=gmail.com >> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; >> d=gmail.com; s=20120113; >> h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to >> :cc; >> bh=qdzMoQT01IzyW8CUlpO8nUk6k9f+Av/f9v8+YsnWaOY=; >> b=ZerIGs9e4TDbkdmaxMpZLKkdxGoeCbUZri928SVN1a/6gQ6mR8KXbkcZnPbjItj8dV >> Xuz20eyVF58v7gmyICDgk0vnF4QSC1jsSQd6LWl6+ONOSgFXZsg/l5RCt3JGx2E2JZPk >> mAgxtT8CFMk8itnXx4V+5IbTrWMZBDVhRwQLx7yZg6KGcZ4p7T8YJVsqo5/7KEgEOP4a >> t77aV1hx1PidQ6U+gRDHmUPMZU9bI8mPQNlF4+TRoZas+RNfakRX5EWMMSa3hDAskUM5 >> ge2w3AVGJdXD8QdSBpd/3WiL33TvkJ+kUwyF4WoM0wiAxDrqu+mgn7jBvYcyNWH2ZcLN >> XO+A== >> X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; >> d=1e100.net; s=20130820; >> h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date >> :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; >> bh=qdzMoQT01IzyW8CUlpO8nUk6k9f+Av/f9v8+YsnWaOY=; >> b=N4PIuCym6oBi55KejCegHaHiQICh/Vs8GET7D+23bcH37bBVOIA9cQXiIMorpl/c+q >> we/J1kvLFFAiEH8Y8HDlKmDzK4iK2nLFNVRmr3DLytmBZ3aJ0ntsaVN6NgBaqadVO/Nm >> wAtnHgaCoXPfYpBmWmarVil14rJOPk9hFTtXONclAUSmvMrMz9ZplGKmhs4zMeZQJ6Iu >> b5DvZWta21Uo/Dxc3Bbs4ZRxjC5RNcIpQ856RRX1cvpNsCIQkJ4iWdfEUUXTp5y32AC4 >> LRNVlzSJrP76/zSZWmz1vlG8ZzO68CWMpU48aOJYggM5nTFRqQvuDYMctP1x0XcOMPGZ >> Ti4Q== >> X-Gm-Message-State: >> AOPr4FWjen4+Tr0Nl3aoO4eF8gbDP9sc8FqDtNTsrXsHl/7I+Zmd++0Vn4Kk+/9vPL+EuG9EA/DzTRMtx+nQEQ== >> X-Received: by 10.129.161.19 with SMTP id y19mr6134393ywg.119.1462394399164; >> Wed, 04 May 2016 13:39:59 -0700 (PDT) >> Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 15:39:59 -0500 >> From: Chase Davis <[email protected]> >> Cc: Mike Larkin <[email protected]>, [email protected] >> X-XS4ALL-DNSBL-Checked: mxdrop307.xs4all.net checked 209.85.161.175 against >> DNS blacklists >> X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=dJzko6Rb c=1 sm=0 tr=0 >> a=eTW0FCcviAf4JPckMbNskg==:117 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=yrkiwgmsf1kA:10 >> a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=0usQZD8xVr2ZoruZCogA:9 >> X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner >> X-XS4ALL-Spam-Score: 0.0 () DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, >> FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM, SPF_PASS >> X-XS4ALL-Spam: NO >> Envelope-To: [email protected] >> >> Makes perfect sense. Thanks for all the help. I will make sure that we >> are using release. Is there any other reason you could think of why >> match wouldn't work if SEL0002 shows up in the DSDT table? > > It wouldn't work on 5.9 release. You need to be working in -current. > > Try booting an unmodified 5.9-current snapshot on the machine in > question. It should print a line like: > > "SEL0002" at acpi0 not configured > > As long as that line appears, your driver should attach when you add > it to a -current source tree and build a new kernel. -- Chase Davis
