Theo de Raadt wrote: > From the beginning we were promised that modifying a program to use > IPv6 only required opening a 2nd socket using AF_INET6. Then the > recipes grew, and grew and grew. It went astray. > > 10,000 programs don't follow the practice. If everyone has to follow > this practice, then the practice is wrong. If basically noone follows > the practice, then the practice is also wrong.
I can't disagree with this.
