On Tue, 17 May 2016, Henning Brauer wrote: > > What about systems with net.inet6.ip6.v6only=0? > > Those haven't been taken into consideration by yours truly and might be > the compelling argument to have this code :)
That sysctl isn't hooked up to anything, it should be removed. (compare IPV6CTL_VARS against IPV6CTL_NAMES in in6.h) -d
