Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > >> > >> Since PT_WRITE_I and PT_WRITE_D are documented as strictly equivalent > >> since rev. 1.1, I doubt that such an optimization is a good idea. > > > > A clear case where the documentation is wrong. > > > The documentation may have been wrong for some time on some archs, it > feels like making PT_WRITE_D and PT_WRITE_I equivalent was deemed > useful at one point. Given that Free and NetBSD document the same > guarantee, I personally don't feel comfortable changing that, but YMMV.
This is a trap designed to make code work on amd64 and fail on hppa. But if kettenis cares more about hppa than most people, maybe we should let him be the one to decide. :)
