> Mark Kettenis wrote: > > I sympathise with the idea, but your implementation would still print > > "funny" times if your machine had been up for more than a day. > > The perils of rebooting. I tested with an hour, then bumped to a day for > margin. But really, I think even up to ten years would work. Any "date" from > the 70s is far more likely to be an interval than a timestamp, no?
The purpose of ktrace is to help debugging. As it stands right now, it is very unreadable. It is difficult to verify timestamps.
