On 2016/07/06 19:28, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > On 06/07/16(Wed) 10:20, Todd C. Miller wrote: > > Slightly off-topic but should we mark RTF_MASK for eventual removal > > as it is unused? > > This should be asked to ports@ people. They cope with what the > ecosystem consider as the BSD routing table interface. >
Easy to cope, the only thing needing a change is nsh. It's also present in quagga (for printing) but it's behind an ifdef. And the usual consts in go (main go ports and a bunch of vendored things now they have decided to copy things everywhere) that nobody is actually using.
