faq4.html [1] already deal with the problem. [1] http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html#AddThoughts
2016-07-19 3:29 GMT+02:00 Josh Grosse <[email protected]>: > I had a conversation with a new OpenBSD user who thought that he > may have either misunderstood or been misled by the guidance to unpack > the ports tree tarball in /usr. He quickly discovered his 2G /usr > default allocation was too small when he began to build ports. > > FAQ 15 doesn't warn users who selected automatic disk allocation that > the default partition size may be inadequate for all but minor ports building. > > This proposed recommendation adds two sentences which may clarify, > following immediately after the untar example. > > Index: faq15.html > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/www/faq/faq15.html,v > retrieving revision 1.138 > diff -u -p -r1.138 faq15.html > --- faq15.html 18 Jun 2016 02:24:32 -0000 1.138 > +++ faq15.html 19 Jul 2016 01:18:34 -0000 > @@ -763,6 +763,15 @@ For example: > # <b>tar xzf /tmp/ports.tar.gz</b> > </pre></blockquote> > > +If you installed OpenBSD with automatic disk partition allocations, > +<tt>/usr</tt> may be too small to contain the ports tree and > +any active <tt>WRKOBJDIR</tt> build directories created in > +<tt>/usr/ports/pobj</tt> by default. > +A larger <tt>/usr</tt>, a separate <tt>/usr/ports</tt> partition, a > +separate <tt>/usr/ports/pobj</tt> partition, or a non-standard > +location for <tt>WRKOBJDIR</tt> may be considered. > + > +<p> > If you'd like to be able to write to <tt>/usr/ports</tt> as a regular user, > see <a href="#PortsConfig">the next section</a>. > > -- Cordialement, Coues Ludovic +336 148 743 42
