Bob Beck wrote: > Note - NFS has similar behaviour ;) > > at least within a directory. - so this isn't tht "unusual" for non-local > > I'm wondering if this isn't a bit premature Have you looked for other side > effects of this removal?
I think the nature of FUSE is that it's used with even "faker" filesystems, such that the backend may not even have filesystem like semantics. We should be careful what we assume. Also, the fuse daemon can probably do a better job of caching because it has more specialized knowledge. It can cache more than names, too.
