On 2016/08/17 10:11, Peter Hessler wrote:
> It sure would be nice if we could see the PID of the process that added
> routes. Heck, route(8) even tries to print them already.
>
> Add the fields to the appropriate struct, and while here, document which
> fields are in sync.
>
> (requested by krw@)
>
> OK?
>
>
> Index: net/if.h
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/openbsd/src/sys/net/if.h,v
> retrieving revision 1.177
> diff -u -p -u -p -r1.177 if.h
> --- net/if.h 10 Jun 2016 20:33:29 -0000 1.177
> +++ net/if.h 19 Jul 2016 13:41:53 -0000
> @@ -267,6 +267,7 @@ struct if_msghdr {
> int ifm_addrs; /* like rtm_addrs */
> int ifm_flags; /* value of if_flags */
> int ifm_xflags;
> + pid_t ifam_pid; /* identify sender */
> struct if_data ifm_data;/* statistics and other data about if */
> };
should this be ifm not ifam?
it might be better after ifm_data (probably won't pack as well, but
I think lower impact on software using if_msghdr).
>
> @@ -286,6 +287,7 @@ struct ifa_msghdr {
> int ifam_addrs; /* like rtm_addrs */
> int ifam_flags; /* value of ifa_flags */
> int ifam_metric; /* value of ifa_metric */
> + pid_t ifam_pid; /* identify sender */
> };
I'll try to figure out ports impact of this, but it probably won't be today.
