On 17 August 2016 at 10:01, Simon Mages <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > while i was debugging dlg@'s diff regarding the bigger mbuf clusters i > stumbled > across a bug in the PRU_SEND case in uicp_usrreq.c. > > There is a call to sbappendcontrol which can fail, but there is no > error handling done. > If sbappendcontrol fails m will be set to NULL, which just leaks this > mbuf because > it was never put into the sb. > > I think the following diff fixes this problem by handly the error correctly. >
I believe this is correct. OK mikeb
