On 16/08/2016 20:03, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > Not (yet?) committed. Can you explain why you think that it > appeared in version 1?
Appologies Ingo, I made a mistake here, I was using the snippet of code set to v1 boiler plate, got distracted halfway through making the change & skipped changing the v1 to v5 & moved on. > I don't see it here: > > http://www.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=V1/man/man1 > > I don't even see it in v2, v3, or v4. > > The earliest instance is can find is in v5: > > http://www.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=V5/usr/source/s1/dd.c You're right, it should be v5, not v1. Sevan
