On Thursday, 25 August 2016, Ted Unangst <t...@tedunangst.com> wrote:
> Andreas Bartelt wrote: > > On 08/25/16 15:58, Brent Cook wrote: > > > No objection here. Anyone else? > > > > > > > in general, I personally would only add further cryptographic primitives > > to a TLS configuration in case they provide sufficiently distinctive > > advantages over the already available primitives. I don't see this for > > Camellia since it doesn't seem to provide any better trade-offs than > > AES. Or am I missing something here? > > Oh, I don't think we should add this to any default config. But the option > should be available for users to configure. > yes on both counts
