Re: m_copym2 is unused, let's remove it

[David Gwynne]

Yes, this is just a conservative first step to that.

On 14 Sep 2016 12:00 p.m., "Todd C. Miller" <todd.mil...@courtesan.com>
wrote:

> Looks OK.  Do you intend to change m_copym0 to m_copym and remove
> the deep copy code?
>
>  - todd
>