On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 03:55:14PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote: > On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 03:09:49PM +0200, Martin Natano wrote: > > > > Seems right to me. I wonder whether we should enforce root for includes > > like we do for build. Either in the command list of the target, or even > > something like this: > > I'm somewhat torn. Most, if not all, of the targets require root at > some point, don't they? Do we want to annotate all of them? How much > handholding do we really need to add to the Makefile? > > Adding the warning to 'make build' and 'make release' made sense since > these are targets that are used by many and they are going through a > drastic transformation.
Fair point, I'd say go ahead with your original diff then. It's an improvement to what we have now. We can add require_root markers if/when we have decided where to put them. natano
