On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 09:27:14PM +0300, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> 2016-12-20 20:30 GMT+03:00 Theo de Raadt <[email protected]>:
> >> I had to dig into sa sources to get know what trailing '*' in
> >> command names mean. IMHO, that's not how manuals should work. :)
> >>
> >> Okay?
> >
> > That seems a little awkward mentioning fork directly.  How about
> >
> > Children which have not yet called
> > .Xr execve 2
> > will have
> > .Sq *
> > appended to their command names.
> 
> Seems fine for me as well.
> 

it reads fine to me too, so please go ahead and fix. the last two
paragraphs of sa(8) are a bit clumsy i think since they more or less
repeat what -m and -u do and then, outwith the descriptions of -m and
-u, say which options are affected by -m and -u. i think we could clean
that whole bit up, and move this new text up, but it could easily be done
separately.

jmc

Reply via email to