On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 4:49 AM, Mark Kettenis <mark.kette...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 13:28:26 +0100
>> From: Christian Weisgerber <na...@mips.inka.de>
>> libm uses copysign() and copysignf() internally, but fails to declare
>> the amd64 assembly versions that way.  When built with clang, this
>> results in undefined references to _libm_copysign etc.
>> Presumably gcc replaces those calls to copysign with a builtin, but
>> clang doesn't.
> Looks correct to me.  Hopefully guenther@ can confirm?

Looks right.  Might as well make the same change in libm/arch/i387/ so
that they stay in sync for the symbols that they provide.
ok guenther@

(Hmm, copysign(3) doesn't mention that it's in C99)

Reply via email to