On 31.1.2017. 18:14, David Hill wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:43:26AM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: >> On 27/01/17(Fri) 14:33, David Hill wrote: >>> [...] >>> Forgot a file... Try this: >> Is it now possible to pass a 'struct mbuf *' instead of a 'struct mbuf **' >> to the pr_ctloutput() functions? >> >> Changing the signature would ensure we do not miss a call. This would >> also simplify the SETOPT case. >> > with mpi@'s suggestion to pass a struct mbuf *
one trace less :) tnx ..
