> Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 11:32:07 +1100
> From: Jonathan Gray <j...@jsg.id.au>
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 09:53:41PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > It's currently a bit of a pain to install clang and ld.lld, but keep
> > gcc and ld.bfd as the default compiler/linker. You can't rebuild
> > clang with base gcc and you really want to rebuild it with clang
> > instead of the ports gcc after boostrapping. And overwriting the
> > default compiler/linker links is annoying. Especially on platforms
> > where lld doesn't work yet. The diff below would make my life easier
> > and hopefully get more people involved.
> >
> > This partly reverts the changes made by jsg@ in Brisbane, but I think
> > we need this if we want clang/lld on more platforms than just arm64.
> >
> > ok?
> >
> >
> > Index: gnu/usr.bin/clang/Makefile.inc
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/gnu/usr.bin/clang/Makefile.inc,v
> > retrieving revision 1.4
> > diff -u -p -u -p -r1.4 Makefile.inc
> > --- gnu/usr.bin/clang/Makefile.inc 16 Feb 2017 02:08:42 -0000 1.4
> > +++ gnu/usr.bin/clang/Makefile.inc 15 Mar 2017 20:21:06 -0000
> > @@ -6,6 +6,9 @@ BOOTSTRAP_CLANG?=no
> > .if ${BOOTSTRAP_CLANG} == "yes"
> > CC= egcc
> > CXX= eg++
> > +.else
> > +CC= clang
> > +CXX= clang++
> > .endif
>
> This entire block should be just
>
> .if ${COMPILER_VERSION:L} == "gcc4"
> CC= clang
> CXX= clang++
> .endif
>
> A list of compilers that don't handle the latest c++ standard.
And then we'd simply bootstrap with the ports clang instead of ports gcc?
