On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 09:15:09AM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote: > On Mon, 20 Mar 2017, Dale Rahn wrote: > ... > > Including the thread pointer would seem to make sense, but there is there > > a proc vs process issue there (thread vs p > > Uh, the registers are _all_ per-thread! > > > Philip >
Oops? I thought I had deleted that line of comment in the email. I had looked it up and realized my mistake already. Dale Rahn dr...@dalerahn.com
