On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 11:21:00PM -0700, Christopher Hettrick wrote:
> Hi tech@
>
> The arguments to malloc() in the EXAMPLE section are not consistent.
> Make a couple other consistency fixes as well.
Committed, thanks,
-Otto
>
> Index: malloc.3
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/stdlib/malloc.3,v
> retrieving revision 1.108
> diff -u -p -r1.108 malloc.3
> --- malloc.3 29 Mar 2017 17:38:37 -0000 1.108
> +++ malloc.3 6 Apr 2017 03:18:49 -0000
> @@ -177,9 +177,9 @@ is set to
> .Er ENOMEM .
> .Pp
> If
> -.Fa size
> -or
> .Fa nmemb
> +or
> +.Fa size
> is equal to 0, a unique pointer to an access protected,
> zero sized object is returned.
> Access via this pointer will generate a
> @@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ size_t num, size;
> if (size && num > SIZE_MAX / size)
> errc(1, EOVERFLOW, "overflow");
>
> -if ((p = malloc(size * num)) == NULL)
> +if ((p = malloc(num * size)) == NULL)
> err(1, NULL);
> .Ed
> .Pp
> @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ if (size < 0 || num < 0)
> if (size && num > INT_MAX / size)
> errc(1, EOVERFLOW, "overflow");
>
> -if ((p = malloc(size * num)) == NULL)
> +if ((p = malloc(num * size)) == NULL)
> err(1, NULL);
> .Ed
> .Pp
> @@ -471,9 +471,9 @@ functions conform to
> .St -ansiC .
> .Pp
> If
> -.Fa size
> -or
> .Fa nmemb
> +or
> +.Fa size
> are 0, the return value is implementation defined;
> other conforming implementations may return
> .Dv NULL