On 01.05.2017 12:28, Mark Kettenis wrote: >> From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyu...@google.com> >> Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 10:43:26 +0200 >> >> On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Greg Steuck <blackgne...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I naively tried to build something with -fsanitize=address using llvm-4.0 >>> port available on OpenBSD 6.1-amd64. I was immediately greeted with: >>> clang-4.0: error: unsupported option '-fsanitize=address' for target >>> 'amd64-unknown-openbsd6.1' >>> >>> How deep a rat hole does one have to go to port ASan to a new >>> flavour of BSD? Is OpenBSD going to be particularly painful with >>> its special malloc and advanced ASLR? Is anybody working on this? > > Our focus is currently still on integrating llvm/clang/lld into > OpenBSD. As far as I know nobody is working on this yet, but it > sounds like something we'd certainly be interested in having. >
I'm interested in llvm sanitizers and fuzzers on NetBSD. Currently my focus is on LLDB, and next I will plan move on to LLD (linker). The current solution on NetBSD is to use the GNU flavors that work well.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
