On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 09:28:57PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 21:08 +0000, Carl Mascott wrote: > > OK, I was indeed missing something. Thanks, Theo and Mike. > > > > I think I see another very minor problem, though. > > Let the pf BW be 9,999,999. > > Shift right 3 digits (divide by 1000) : yields 9,999K. > > (If we were doing floating point arithmetic, would yield 9,999.999K.) > > You (Mike) don't round this, presumably to avoid overflow to 10,000 (5 > > digits). > > However, since (i < 3) it could have been rounded and scaled again, to 10M. > > Slightly more accurate but not a big deal. > > > > You're right, initially I had a "<= 9999" there but then I got > sidetracked with a hypothetical problem that right now seems > like my imagination. I've double checked numbers and indeed, > it should be "if (rtmp <= 9999)".
Ah, indeed.
