On 9.6.2017. 14:55, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote: > Hello, > > > On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 01:11:01PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 10:55:46AM +0200, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote: >>> would it make sense to commit a poor man's solution below, before pfsync(4) >>> will get to shape? The idea is to grab PF_LOCK, just before we pass the data >>> to PF for further processing. >> Whatever helps to make progress with pf is fine. We should not >> delay unlocking pf until someone steps in and refactors pfsync. >> >> OK bluhm@ >> > I still would like to ask Hrvoje to give it a try first. I believe the fix > should work, but I could not try it as I don't have working pfsync set up > available for testing. > > thanks and > regards > sasha >
Hi all, with this diff i don't see any traces as before.
