On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 04:04:47PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Bryan Steele wrote on Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 09:38:32AM -0400:
> 
> > This was a feature added last year by nicm@, not touching emacs.c
> > at all..
> 
> edit.c is a helper file containing common utilities for emacs.c
> and vi.c.  So it is also misdocumented.  It is only documented
> for emacs mode, but vi mode does it, too.
> 
> > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=147300974112400&w=2
> > http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/bin/ksh/edit.c.diff?r1=1.57&r2=1.54
> 
> I must have missed it.
> I probably would have opposed it if i had noticed it.

Ingo,

i agree that sometimes you need to keep stuff clean and readable and
etc, but if you are at a point that your shell doesn't offer you
'basic' features (present in almost every other shell) that *improves*
your productivity and you need to use another shell for that, then
you've lost.

I, for one, welcome the ability to easily define such completions,
especially for ssh hosts when you have to manage dozens of them.

Landry

Reply via email to