> But I'd like to stay strict matching the filenames.
>
> + for _liba in /usr/lib/lib{c,crypto}; do
> + _libas="$_libas $(ls $_liba.so.+([0-9.]).a | sort -V | tail -1)"
> + done
Yes, this is indeed better.
So Klemens, can you write a patch that uses this and removes the then
unused _l. We can think about the hoisting in a second step.
> > + _libas=${_libas# }
>
> This would be another way of suppressing the blank right away.
> But it's not really necessary anyway, because the leading blank is
> removed in the list of the other for-loop.
>
> _libas="${_libas:+$_libas }$(ls $_liba.so.+([0-9.]).a | sort -V | tail
> -1)"
While this is is clever, it does a bit too much in one line for my taste.
I'm fine with Klemens's version of zapping the blank after the for loop,
but we can also omit this, I don't really care.
>
> > # Remount read-write, if /usr/lib is on a read-only ffs filesystem.
> > if [[ $_mp == *' type ffs '*'read-only'* ]]; then
> >
>
> --
> -=[rpe]=-
>
