I don't see any problem with the sentence as it stands now. This same text exists in 18 other pages. I'd say it originally came from pf.conf(5).
> Not entirely sure what the author had in mind but the current > sentence, as it is, doesn't seem right somehow. > > The below is my best guess. > > Cheers, > > Raf > > Index: usr.sbin/ldapd/ldapd.conf.5 > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ldapd/ldapd.conf.5,v > retrieving revision 1.22 > diff -u -p -r1.22 ldapd.conf.5 > --- usr.sbin/ldapd/ldapd.conf.5 17 Oct 2016 14:03:17 -0000 1.22 > +++ usr.sbin/ldapd/ldapd.conf.5 29 Aug 2017 20:18:33 -0000 > @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ must be quoted. > Arguments containing whitespace should be surrounded by double quotes > .Pq \&" . > .Pp > -Macros can be defined that will later be expanded in context. > +Macros can be defined and will later be expanded in context. > Macro names must start with a letter, digit, or underscore, > and may contain any of those characters. > Macro names may not be reserved words (for example >
