On Mon, 02 Oct 2017 19:05:37 +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > Although I think the bug that syslogd was running into was failure > in source address selection. Then the temporary bind failed as > there was no suitable address. There is no "specified address".
But the source address was specified in the sockaddr passed to sendto(2), no? > Perhaps "No suitable address is available..." for both sendto(2) > and connect(2) is more precise. And bind(2) talks about "the local > machine". > > So I guess we should say "No suitable address is available on the > local machine." If you think that is better, I have no real objection. - todd
