On 09/10/17(Mon) 14:35, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 12:27:50PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > On 09/10/17(Mon) 12:22, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 12:15:46PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > > > Diff below is a small cleanup to keep the accounting of events in > > > > sync with the number of events on the list. This is a noop for the > > > > moment, but it's small & easy part to review of my upcoming diff. > > > > > > Well, not counting the markers allows skipping the scan when no real > > > content is on the list. That's a non-trivial condition if the list is > > > scanned by multiple threads and started non-empty. > > > > I don't understand if you're suggesting something or not. Did you spot > > something wrong in the diff I sent? > > You are removing optimisation potential. Counting only real events is > more useful than counting the entries on the list.
You clearly didn't read my diff. I'm not changing anything.
