I was reading pkg_sign.1 and noticed that the description for the -o
option seems incorrect. The current pkg_sign.1 text says under the -o
option that "Otherwise, unsigned packages are created in the current
directory" where I think it should say "Otherwise, signed packages are
created in the current directory." It is possible I am misunderstanding
the text and, in that case, further clarification is needed. If the -o
option is omitted, are packages signed and then that new signed package
replaces the previously unsigned package in the current directory?
Attached is a patch that corrects the text according to my understanding
of it.

Bryan


Index: usr.sbin/pkg_add/pkg_sign.1
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/pkg_add/pkg_sign.1,v
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -p -r1.10 pkg_sign.1
--- usr.sbin/pkg_add/pkg_sign.1 15 Feb 2017 13:19:08 -0000      1.10
+++ usr.sbin/pkg_add/pkg_sign.1 9 Oct 2017 22:49:13 -0000
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ in the listing.
 Sign existing packages in parallel.
 .It Fl o Ar dir
 Specify output directory for signing packages.
-Otherwise, unsigned packages are created in the current directory.
+Otherwise, signed packages are created in the current directory.
 .It Fl S Ar source
 Source repository for packages to be signed.
 .\" This can be any url admissible for a

Reply via email to