On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:14:22AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > This is not a problem. The way knote_acquire() is designed is to sleep > for a small amount of time, 1 * hz for the moment.
Ah yes, I see the hz now. So there cannot be starvation. This is a best effort algorithm, we do not need reliable wakeups. In the few cases they are missing, we continue after 1 hz. I think that is fine. > And I think > we should continue to sync with their work. This is a valid reason. OK bluhm@
