On 2017/10/25 21:03, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2017/10/25 19:46, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > > I gather this isn't very friendly towards existing scripts parsing > > this output, but YMMV. > > I don't see anything in ports that cares. The only thing that parses > netstat -m output at all seems to be some code in gnupg/libgcrypt/mcrypt > that uses it as (one among several) sources to seed RNG. > > There are some things that do look at mbuf use for monitoring etc (symon > for example) but I think usually not per-interface. >
...don't know what I was thinking about per-interface there. Anyway at least symon is using sysctl for this, see symon/platform/OpenBSD/sm_mbuf.c, so netstat -m changes won't affect it, but the underlying problem making "max" useless probably affects it too. (I don't use it any more..)
