On Sun, 2017-12-10 at 12:48 -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote: > In our tree, all security or front-facing code must be maintained by > an interested individual/group. If it isn't maintained eventually it > will become a hinderance towards other developments, or error prone > and therefore a risk factor. It gets marginalized by other changes. > Then it gets the axe.
Completely understandable! :) > Every part of the tree needs believers who commit their time to > keeping that part good, or even better -- improving it. Especially > relevant as minimum standards of quality rises. +1 > [...] > Expanding mindshare is a hard social problem, so I'm glad you mailed > in... hopefully you take the bait mpi has placed in the > trap^W^W^W^W^W^W^W He he, well we'll see ;-) It's not the first time I've considered pitching in with OpenBSD, and seeing as multicast is a bit of hobby of mine, as well as part of my daily work, it could very well be what pulls me in. Thank you for your thorough reply! Best regards /Joachim
