> So i really don't feel like adding a BUGS section, but instead i > think documenting that -i is intended as an ASCII-only feature is > the way to go.
Yes, sounds reasonable. > While here, profit from the opportunity to mention that uniq(1) is > intended to work on the level of codepoints, not on the level of > fully combined characters. > > OK? ok, I think that's an improvement. Thanks.
