On Thu, Feb 01 2018, Scott Cheloha <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 07:25:58AM +0000, Jason McIntyre wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 05:52:35AM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote: >> > On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 09:35:33PM -0600, Scott Cheloha wrote: >> > > [...] >> > > >> > > I'm not sure whether the larger range is actually an extension to the >> > > standard, and if so whether we need to mention it in the manpage, but >> > > I've included a diff here anyway just in case. If you have ideas about >> > > the wording I'd love to hear them. >> > > >> > > Thoughts? ok? >> > >> > The diff for sleep.c is ok. >> > >> > For the manpage part, I have no strong opinion, but I'm not so sure this >> > is needed/useful. That sleeping for fractions of a second isn't portable >> > definitely has practical relevance, sleeping longer than 68 years not so >> > much. I'll leave this for jmc to decide. >> >> i tend to agree that it's not worth documenting, unless you have a >> concrete reason to do so. > > ... definitely not worth mentioning then. > > Additional oks for just the sleep.c portion?
Yep, ok jca@ -- jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
